In collaboration with Scientific Association of Iranian Medicinal Plants

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Research and Technology Institute of Plant Production, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Ph.D. student of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Fusarium wilt disease is the most important disease of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and causes great damage to it every year. The present study was conducted to evaluate the response of 13 cumin genotypes to Fusarium wilt disease as a factorial experiment in a completely randomized design (genotype as the first factor and absence and presence of the pathogen as the second one) with three replications in the greenhouse of Research and Technology Institute of Plant Production, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman during growing season of 2020-2021. The results showed that the interaction of genotype and treatment was statistically significant on most of the traits. The highest traits correlation was observed between plant dry weight and number of umbrellas per plant (0.92) under the absence of pathogen conditions and between plant height and number of seeds per plant (0.76) under the presence of pathogen conditions. Cluster analysis (Ward method) regarding the studied traits divided the genotypes into three groups under the absence of pathogen conditions and two groups under the presence of pathogen. Principal component analysis showed that the first two components could explain 80.13% (absence of pathogen) and 84.55% (presence of pathogen) of the variations. Also, biplot analysis showed high diversity of the genotypes as well as confirming the clustering results. The genotype E7r1b1 had the highest plant mortality ratio (100%) under the presence of pathogen. Under the absence of pathogen, the genotype g8r2b2 had the highest yield (0.20 g) and number (75.66) of seeds per plant. Yield and number of seeds per plant decreased significantly under the presence of pathogen. The highest seed yield (0.14 g) under the presence of pathogen was observed in the genotype 2-14-3. Based on the studied traits, the genotypes g5r2B1 and F12r1b1 had the lowest potential compared to the others under the both conditions. In general, the genotypes reacted differently under the absence and presence of pathogen conditions. The genotypes that revealed tolerance to the disease conditions could be introduced as sources of tolerance in further breeding programs.

Keywords

Main Subjects

- Aghnoom, R., Falahi-rastegar, M. and Jafarpour, B., 1999. Comparison of chemical and biological control of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini in laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Iranian Journal Agriculture science, 30(3): 616-630.
- Bahraminejad, A., Mohammadi-Nejad, G. and Abdul Khadir, M., 2011. genetic diversity evaluation of cumin (Cumin cyminum L.) based on phenotypic characteristics. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(3): 304-310.
- Chapman, S.C., Crossa, J., Basford, K.E. and Kroonenberg, P.M., 1997. Genotype by environment effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. II. Three-mode pattern analysis. Euphytica, 95(1): 11-20.
- Dorrani-Nejad, M., Aghighi, S. and Mohammadi-Nejad, G., 2019. The evaluation of the elite genotypes for drought tolerance in cumin (Cuminum Cyminum L.) using drought tolerance indices. Journal of Plant Productions (Agronomy, Breeding and Horticulture), 42(2): 227-238.
- Faravani, M., Jafari, A.A., Ranjbar, M., Negari, A. and Azizi, N., 2018. Study of phenological, morphological and phytochemical characteris-tics of cumin ecotypes under Mashhad climatic conditions. Applied Field Crops Research (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi), 31(3): 95-113.
- Ghanbari, J., Khajoei-nejad, G.R. and Mohammadi-nejad, G., 2017. Study of ecotype and sowing date interaction in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) using different univariate stability parameters. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 15(1): 87-102.
- Hasanian, S., Sofalian, O., Davari, M., Asghari, A. and Karimizadeh, R., 2016. Evaluation of some lentil genotypes for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis resistance. Plant Protection, 39(3): 27-37.
- Karimi Afshar, A., Baghizadeh, A., Mohammadi-Nejad, Gh. and Abedi, J., 2014. Assessment of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) genotypes under drought stress based on drought tolerance indicators. 1st International Congress and 13th Iranian Genetics Congress, Tehran, 24-26 May: 1-4.
- Kazemi, S.F., Farahi, A.S. and Sharafi, A.E., 2002. Effect of water stress on seed yield and some growth traits in cumin (Cuminum cyminym). Pajohesh-&-Sazandegi, 15(1): 42-45.
- Nouraein, M., Khavari-Khorasani, S. and Akhavan, M., 2020. Screening cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) landraces for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini. Australasian Plant Pathology, 49(3): 295-305.
- Pearson, K., 1901. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11): 559-572.
- Safari, B., Mahdi Mortazavian, S.M., Sadat-Noori, S.A. and Foghi, B., 2015. Effect of water stress on yield and yield components of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) ecotypes. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding, 5(2): 51-61.
- Salamati, M.S. and Zeinali, H., 2013. Evaluation of genetic variation in different populations of Cuminum cyminum L. using morphological traits. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 29(1): 51-62.
- Salami, M.R., Safarnejad, A. and Hamidi, H., 2007. Effect of salinity stress on morphological characters of Cuminum cyminum and Valeriana officinalis. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 19(3): 77-83.
- Talaviya, J.R., Kapadiya, I.B., Bhaliya, C.M. and Lathiya, S.V., 2017. Screening of Cumin Varieties/Lines against Wilt Disease. International Journal of Current Microbiology an Applied Sciences, 6(6): 3173-3176.
- Zabet, M., Ghaderi, M.G. and Sayyari-Zohan, M.H., 2019. The study of salinity tolerance in cumin ecotypes at germination stage. Applied Crop Breeding, 4(1): 17-34.