In collaboration with Scientific Association of Iranian Medicinal Plants

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 عضو هیئت علمی

2 Medicinal Plants and By-products Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

10.22092/ijmapr.2026.369344.3541

Abstract

     Background and Objectives: Given the economic value of many medicinal plant species in Iran and the demand from related industries, identifying and introducing superior accessions to medicinal plant producers can improve the quantity and quality of plant products, enhance their economic value, and contribute to the development of the medicinal plant industry. This study was carried out as part of complementary research designed to introduce selected medicinal plant cultivars for seed production and increase their cultivated area. The objective was to identify the superior Hypericum perforatum accession based on agronomic and phytochemical traits. Four accessions were selected from the preliminary research phase: A01 (Gene Bank accession code 10601) from Ardabil, A02 (Gene Bank accession code 33255) from Qazvin, A03 (Gene Bank accession code 33258) from Qazvin, and A04 (Gene Bank accession code 23335) from Khalkhal.
Methodology: Seeds of the superior H. perforatum accessions selected during the preliminary research phase were transferred to the Alborz Research Station in the winter of 2021. In spring 2022, the seeds were sown in the field using a randomized complete block design with five replications. In 2023, data were recorded during the flowering and seed-ripening stages. Morphological traits, flowering branch yield, and seed yield per hectare were measured. The above-ground parts of the plants were harvested at full flowering to assess their phytochemical characteristics. Different plant organs, including flowers, leaves, stems, and branches, were extracted separately using 80% methanol adjusted to pH 3 under ultrasonic treatment at 50 °C. Hypericin concentrations in the extracts were subsequently determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In addition, total phenolic, flavonoid, and anthocyanin contents, as well as antioxidant activity, were evaluated in the hydroalcoholic extract (80% ethanol) of the flowering branches.
Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences among the H. perforatum accessions in all morphological traits, individual plant weight, flowering branch yield, seed yield, and phenolic, anthocyanin, and hypericin contents at the 1% significance level. Flavonoid content and antioxidant activity differed significantly at the 5% significance level. Mean comparisons using the least significant difference (LSD) test showed that accession A02 from Qazvin had the greatest plant height (65.8 cm), crown circumference (222 cm), individual flowering plant weight (134.8 g), flowering branch yield (5,392 kg ha⁻¹), individual plant seed weight (12.3 g), and seed yield (492 kg ha⁻¹). The highest total phenolic content (6,240.8 μg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) g⁻¹ dry matter) was recorded in accession A04 from Khalkhal. In contrast, accession A03 from Qazvin exhibited the highest flavonoid content (810.7 μg quercetin equivalents (QE) g⁻¹ dry matter), anthocyanin content (2.2 μg cyanidin equivalents g⁻¹ fresh matter), and antioxidant activity (58.9%). Analysis of mean hypericin concentrations across plant organs in the four accessions showed that flowers had the highest concentration (3.84 mg g⁻¹), followed by leaves (2.25 mg g⁻¹) and flowering branches (1.49 mg g⁻¹). Stems contained the lowest concentration (0.68 mg g⁻¹). Simple correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlations between shoot yield and individual plant weight, plant height, and crown circumference. Antioxidant activity was also positively and significantly correlated with hypericin content.
Conclusion: The results identified accession A02 from Qazvin as superior in terms of morphological traits, flowering branch yield, and seed yield, whereas accession A03 from Qazvin showed the highest antioxidant activity. Accession A01 from Ardabil had the highest hypericin concentration in flowering branches. Accordingly, A02 was selected for cultivar introduction, while accessions A01 and A02 appear promising for further research aimed at developing a cultivar with high yield and phytochemical quality.

Keywords

Main Subjects

- Alali, F., Tawaha, K. and Al-Eleimat, T., 2004. Determination of hypericin content in Hypericum triquetrifolium Turra (Hypericaceae) growing wild in Jordan. Natural Product Research, 18: 147-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786410310001608046
- Alahmad, A., Alghoraibi, I., Zein, R., Kraft, S., Dräger, G., Walter, J.G. and Scheper, T., 2022. Identification of major constituents of Hypericum perforatum L. extracts in Syria by development of a rapid, simple, and reproducible HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis and their antioxidant activities. ACS Omega, 7: 13475-13493. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06335
- Azadi, R., 1999. Flora of Iran. Guttiferae, Research institute of forests and rangelands press, 62p. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1289507/
- Baharfar, R., Azimi, R. and Mohseni, M., 2015. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of flavonoid- polyphenol- and anthocyanin-rich extracts from Thymus kotschyanus Boiss & Hohen aerial parts. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(10): 6777-6783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1752-0
- Blois, M.S., 1985. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181: 1199-1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
- Briskin, D.P. and Gawienowski, M.C., 2001. Differential effects of light and nitrogen on production of hypericins and leaf glands in Hypericum perforatum. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 39: 1075-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01326-2
- Chen, H., Muhammad, I., Zhang, Y., Ren, Y., Zhang, R., Huang, X., Diao, L., Liu, H., Li, X., Sun, X., Abbas, G. and Li, G., 2019. Antiviral activity against infectious bronchitis virus and bioactive components of Hypericum perforatum L. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10(1272): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01272
- Choudhary, N., Collignon, T.E., Tewari, D. and Bishayee, A., 2022. Hypericin and its anticancer effects: From mechanism of action to potential therapeutic application. Phytomedicine, 105: 154356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154356
- Cirak, C., Radusiene, J., Jakstas, V., Ivanauskas, L., Yayla, F., Seyis, F. and Camas, N., 2016. Secondary metabolites of Hypericum species from the Drosanthe and Olympia sections. South African Journal of Botany, 104: 82-90. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.022
- Crockett, S.L., Wenzig, E.M., Kunert, O. and Bauer, R., 2008. Anti-inflammatory phloroglucinol
derivatives from Hypericum empetrifolium. Phytochemistry Letters, 1(1): 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2007.12.003
- Ebadi, A., Morshedloo, M.R., Fatahi Moghaddam, M.R. and Yazdani, D., 2011. Evaluation of some population of Hypericum perforatum L. using agro-morphological traits and most components of essential oil. Plant Production Technology, 3(1): 1-14. https://ppt.basu.ac.ir/article_243_en.html
- Eggelkraut-Gottanka, S.V., Abu-Abed, S., Muller, W. and Schmidt, P., 2002. Quantitative analysis of the active components and the by-products of eight dry extracts of Hypericum perforatum L. (St John’s wort). Phytochemical Analysis, 13: 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.638
- Ernst, E., 2003. Hypericum; The Genus Hypericum. Taylor & Francis, Inc., London. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367800963
- Jaimand, K., Rezaee, M.B., Behrad, Z., Mirza, M., Mozaffarian, V., Azady, R., Naderi, M., Golipur, M., Bahmanzadegan, A., Meshkizadeh, S. and Karimi, Sh., 2014. Determination of hypericine content in nine species of Hypericum. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 30(1): 10-18. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijmapr.2014.5261
- Karagül, S., Ozel, D., Ozturk, I. and Yurt, F., 2024. An in vitro evaluation of Hypericum perforatum loaded-chitosan nanoparticle/agarose film as a wound dressing. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 98: 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105873
- Lazzara, S., Carrubba, A. and Napoli, E., 2015. Hypericum spp.: A resource from wild mediterranean flora for the treatment of mild depression: 337-354. In: Gupta, V.K., (Ed.). Bioactive Phytochemicals: Perspectives for Modern Medicine. Daya  Publishing House, New Delhi, 435p. https://hdl.handle.net/10447/181068
- Lebaschi, M.H. and Sharifi, E., 2002. Fluctuation of hypericin in natural habitates of Hypericum perforatum. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 11(1): 87-101. https://ijmapr.areeo.ac.ir/article_118365.html?lang=en
- Mir, M.Y., Hamid, S., Kamili, A.N. and Hassan, Q.P., 2019. Sneak peek of Hypericum perforatum L.: Phytochemistry, phytochemical efficacy and biotechnological interventions. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 28: 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-019-00490-7
- Montoya, A., Daza, A., Munoz, D., Rios, K., Taylor, V., Cedeno D., Velez, I.D., Echeverri, F. and Robledo, S.M. 2015. Development of a novel formulation with hypericin to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis based on photodynamic therapy in vitro and in vivo studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 59(9): 5804-5813. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00545-15
- Nobakht, S.Z., Akaberi, M., Mohammadpour, A.H., Tafazoli Moghadam, A. and Emami, S.A., 2022. Hypericum perforatum: Traditional uses, clinical trials, and drug interactions. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 26(9): 1045-1058. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJBMS.2022.65112.14338
- Oliveira, A.I., Pinho, C., Sarmento, B. and Dias, A.C., 2016. Neuroprotective activity of Hypericum perforatum and its major components. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7:(1004): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01004
- Greeson, J.M., Sanford, B. and Monti, D.A., 2001. St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum): A review of the current pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical literature. Psychopharmacology, 153: 402-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130000625
- Saddiqe, Z., Naeem, I. and Maimoona, A., 2010. A review of the antibacterial activity of Hypericum perforatum L. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 131(3): 511-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.034
- Sayyadi, A., Ahmadi, J., Asghari, B. and Hosseini, SM., 2014. Effect of drought stress and salinity on phenolic ompounds of Thymus vulgaris L. Eco-phytochemical Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2(4): 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.055
- Seyed Hajizadeh, H., Ebadi, B., Morshedloo, M.R. and Abdi Ghazijahani, A., 2021. Morphological and phytochemical diversity among some Iranian  Rosa damascena Mill. Landraces. Journal of Ornamental Plants, 11(4): 243-255. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1033142?FullText=FullText
- Seyrekoglu, F., Temiz, H., Eser, F. and Yildirim, C., 2022. Comparison of the antioxidant activities and major constituents of three Hypericum species (H. perforatum, H. scabrum and H. origanifolium) from Turkey. South African Journal of Botany, 146: 723-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.12.012
- Singleton, V.L., Orthofer R. and Lamuela-Raventós, R.M., 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology, 299: 152-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1
- Suntar, I.P., Akkol, E.K., Yılmazer, D., Baykal, T., Kırmızıbekmez, H., Alper, M. and Yesilad, E., 2010. Investigations on the in vivo wound healing potential of Hypericum perforatum L. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 127(2): 468-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2009.10.011
- Sytar, O., Svediene, J., Loziene, K., Paskevicius, A., Kosyan, A. and Taran, N., 2016. Antifungal properties of hypericin, hypericin tetrasulphonic acid and fagopyrin on pathogenic fungi and spoilage yeasts. Pharmaceutical Biology, 54(12): 3121-3125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2016.1211716
- Tabaei Aghdaei, S.R., Golab Ghadaksaz, R. and Jafari, A.A., 2010. Correlation between flower yield and different characters in Rosa damascena Mill. Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Tchnology, 11(1): 61-70. https://www.sid.ir/paper/80936/en
- Tahmasebi-Boldaji, R., Hatamipour, M.-S., Khanahmadi, M., Sadeh, P. and Najafipour, I., 2019. Ultrasound-assisted packed-bed extraction of hypericin from Hypericum perforatum L. and optimization by response surface methodology. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 57: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.05.018
- Tavakoli, A., 2013. Medicinal Plants. Nazari press, 272p. https://www.gisoom.com/book/1983202/
- Tawaha, K., Gharaibeh, M., El-Elimat, T. and Alali, F.Q., 2010. Determination of hypericin and hyperforin content in selected Jordanian Hypericum species. Industrial Crops and Products, 32: 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.04.017
- Wagner, G.J., 1979. Content and vacuole/extra vacuole distribution of neutral sugars, free amino acids and anthocyanin in protoplasts. Plant Physiology, 64(1): 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.64.1.88
- Wu, J.-J., Zhang, J., Xia, C.-Y., Ding, K., Li, X.-X., Pan, X.-G., Xu, J.-K., He, J. and Zhang, W.-K., 2023. Hypericin: A natural anthraquinone as promising therapeutic agent. Phytomedicine, 111: 154654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154654
- Yoosefi, B., Tabaie-Aghdaie, S.R. and Amiri, A., 2021. Study on yield and flower yield components, essential oil percentage, and some morphological and phenological traits in 48 different accessions of damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill.) in Kermanshah Province. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 37(4): 612-627. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijmapr.2021.353968.2964
- Zirak, N., Shafiee, M., Soltani, G., Mirzaei, M. and Sahebkar, A., 2019. Hypericum perforatum in the treatment of psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders: Current evidence and potential mechanisms of action. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 234(6): 8496-8508. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27781
- Zhao, X., Zhang, H., Wu, Y. and Yu, C., 2023. The efficacy and safety of St. John’s wort extract in depression therapy compared to SSRIs in adults: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 32(2): 151-161. https://doi.org/ 10.17219/acem/152942